My friend Elizabeth has a 7 year old daughter named Katie who could use your help.
Katie has submitted a video to a contest being held by Advent Conspiracy and the winner of the contest gets to go with Living Water International to dig a fresh water well for people who don't have clean water.
Katie wants to save lives. And she's worked very hard, not only to raise money for Advent Conspiracy, but to spread the love of Jesus to people she may never know the names of.
Christmas can [still] change the world.
[Worship fully]
[Spend less]
[Give more]
[Love all]
Please watch Katie's video and then CLICK HERE to vote for her.
What thoughts go through the mind of a middle-aged man who is juggling being a daddy, husband and church tech dude with running a part-time photography business and the occasional two-wheeled adventure while seeking to do God's will? Come along and see.
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Thursday, November 04, 2010
Tools vs. Technology
Yesterday's keynote speaker at WFX was Ed Stetzer. It was a very good talk on how to move people from being passive spectators to active participants in the mission of God in our local churches. He cautioned that technical excellence can turn people into passive consumers of the product of the local church. But, that's a whole other discussion.
This morning in a brief conversation with Anthony Coppedge, he noted how Ed used the terms "tools" and "technology" as almost synonomous things in his speech. Anthony argued that they are not the same and that a "tool" is not a "technology." He used the example of a monkey digging a hole in the ground with a stick reasoning that there's no technology involved just a tool.
I believe that the stick IS the monkey's technology. It's all he has to get that job done. Unless and until his job gets bigger, it's all the technology he needs. Advancements in technology, and therefore our tools, only comes out of necessity.
What do you think? Are "tools" and "technology" synonomous? Does a "tool" not count as "technology" unless and/or until it is used for a purpose?
This morning in a brief conversation with Anthony Coppedge, he noted how Ed used the terms "tools" and "technology" as almost synonomous things in his speech. Anthony argued that they are not the same and that a "tool" is not a "technology." He used the example of a monkey digging a hole in the ground with a stick reasoning that there's no technology involved just a tool.
I believe that the stick IS the monkey's technology. It's all he has to get that job done. Unless and until his job gets bigger, it's all the technology he needs. Advancements in technology, and therefore our tools, only comes out of necessity.
What do you think? Are "tools" and "technology" synonomous? Does a "tool" not count as "technology" unless and/or until it is used for a purpose?
Wednesday, November 03, 2010
Thoughts from WFX - Day One
This week I'm at WFX in Atlanta and I say this every time I go to one of these conferences.
I am truly BLESSED to be on staff at The Crossing.
There are SO many unhealthy churches out there with people who are hurting...really hurting...yet working to spread the gospel in an environment where it isn't being lived out.
It's TRAGIC...and it's not helping the Kingdom. It's not how He intended it.
I keep hearing folks say that when they come to these conferences, they find solace in the fact that other folks have the same challenges and the same issues that they have at their church.
Really?
I'm not talking about technical issues with gear. I'm talking about culture issues. Unhealthy culture issues. I find it disturbing that these folks are working in such unhealthy environments and yet accept it as normal when they find out others are too.
There's a lot of healing that needs to happen in local churches before the work of the Big "C" church can truly be done. My friend Anthony Coppedge says there should be an altar call at one of these events so that these folks can be prayed over. That might be a start, but I don't know if it's enough.
Is the culture in your church what you would consider "healthy?" What can we, as leaders, do to help spread the culture of our local "healthy" churches to other local "unhealthy" churches?
I am truly BLESSED to be on staff at The Crossing.
There are SO many unhealthy churches out there with people who are hurting...really hurting...yet working to spread the gospel in an environment where it isn't being lived out.
It's TRAGIC...and it's not helping the Kingdom. It's not how He intended it.
I keep hearing folks say that when they come to these conferences, they find solace in the fact that other folks have the same challenges and the same issues that they have at their church.
Really?
I'm not talking about technical issues with gear. I'm talking about culture issues. Unhealthy culture issues. I find it disturbing that these folks are working in such unhealthy environments and yet accept it as normal when they find out others are too.
There's a lot of healing that needs to happen in local churches before the work of the Big "C" church can truly be done. My friend Anthony Coppedge says there should be an altar call at one of these events so that these folks can be prayed over. That might be a start, but I don't know if it's enough.
Is the culture in your church what you would consider "healthy?" What can we, as leaders, do to help spread the culture of our local "healthy" churches to other local "unhealthy" churches?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)